新技术冲击、产业演化与公共政策选择——以新能源车为例

doi:F 426

系统管理学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 321-332.DOI: F 426

新技术冲击、产业演化与公共政策选择——以新能源车为例

孙晓华，李明珊，刘小玲，郭少蓉

大连理工大学经济学院，辽宁大连 116024

收稿日期:2014-01-20 修回日期:2014-05-14
作者简介:孙晓华(1978-)，男，教授，博士生导师。研究方向为产业经济学、演化经济学与创新经济学。 E-mail: sxh_dut@sina.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目（14BGL14）；国家软科学研究计划资助项目（2013GXS4D108）；教育部人文社科基金资助项目（13YJC790127）；辽宁省教育厅一般研究资助项目（L2013039）

New Technology Shock, Industry Evolution and Public Policy Choice: the Case of New Energy Vehicle

SUN Xiao-hua，LI Ming-shan，LIU Xiao-ling，GUO Shao-rong

Department of Economics，Dalian University of Technology，Dalian 116024，Liaoning，China

Received:2014-01-20 Revised:2014-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在日益增强的资源环境约束下，战略性新兴产业被各国政府作为未来产业布局的重点。以新能源车为研究对象，对N-W模型和历史友好模型加以拓展，从产品性能、销售价格和消费支出3个维度表征新旧技术范式，构建了包含企业决策、消费者选择和市场竞争的市场选择机制，基于系统模拟方法仿真了新技术冲击下的汽车产业演化过程，进而考察了公共政策对新能源车企业的扶持效应，结果发现：当传统汽车率先进入市场时，凭借产品性能和销售价格优势成为市场主导，只有少部分新能源车企业能够在市场中生存，但利润水平和市场份额都十分有限；消费补贴有利于降低新能源车的价格门槛，在短期内起到刺激新能源车购买的功能，政策效应较为迅速；基础设施建设则通过提高消费者后续使用的满意程度扩大需求规模，虽然作用效果相对迟缓，但从根本上增强了新能源车企业的竞争力。

关键词: 新技术, 市场选择机制, 产业演化, 公共政策

Abstract: With growing constraints on resources and environments, strategic emerging industries are regarded as a key to the plan of future industries by governments. With the case of new energy car, we extend the N-W model and history friendly model, and characterize the old and new technology paradigms via product performance, sale price and consumer expenditure, and construct the market selection mechanism with business decision, consumer choice and market competition. Using system simulation, we simulate the car industry evolution process under the new technology shock, and study the support effect of public policy for new energy car companies. The results show that, when traditional cars enter the market first, they can become the market leader with the advantages of product performance and sale price, only a small part of the new energy car companies can survive in the market, but the profit level and market share are very limited; consumer subsidies help reduce the price threshold of new energy car and stimulate the purchase of new energy car in the short term, and the effect of policy is responsive; infrastructure construction through improved consumer satisfaction of subsequent use to expand the scale of demand, although the effect being relatively slow, enhances the competitiveness of new energy car companies fundamentally.

Key words: new technology, market selection mechanism, industry evolution, public policy

孙晓华，李明珊，刘小玲，郭少蓉. 新技术冲击、产业演化与公共政策选择——以新能源车为例[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015, 24(3): 321-332.

参考文献

[[1]] Schumpeter J A. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy[M]. Fifth edition. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1976.
[[1]] Abernathy W J, Utterback J M. Patterns of innovation in technology[J]. Technology Review, 1978, 80(7):40-47.
[[1]] Nelson R R, Winter S G. An evolutionary theory of economic Change[J]. Massachusetts: Belk-nap Press of Harvard University, 1982.
[[1]] Arthur W B. Competing Technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events[J]. The Economic Journal, 1989, 99(394): 116-131.
[[1]] Audretsch D B. Innovation and industry evolution[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.
[[1]] Klepper S. Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycles[J]. The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(3): 562-583.
[[1]] Malerba F, Orsenigo L. Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: towards a history friendly model[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2002,11(4):667-703.
[[1]] Klepper S, Simons K L. Industry shakeouts and technological change [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2005, 23 (1-2): 23-43.
[[1]] Malerba F, Nelson R R, Orsenigo L, Winter S. Competition and industrial policies in a ‘history friendly’ model of the evolution of the computer industry[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001(19):635-664.
[[1]] Wade, R. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in east asian industrialization[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
[[1]] Breznitz D. Industrial R&D as a national policy: Horizontal technology policies and industry-state co-evolution in the growth of the Israeli software industry[J]. Research Policy,2007,36(9):65-82.
[[1]] Henri L F. de Groot, Peter M, Daan P van S. Subsidizing the adoption of energy-saving technologies: Analyzing the impact of uncertainty, learning and maturation[J]. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers,2003,19(3):1-25.
[[1]] Rob A, Eline van der H, Jan P, Daan van S, Herman V. Technology adoption subsidies: An experiment with managers [J]. Energy Economics,2009,31(3):431-442.
[[1]] Wahab M. Asymmetric output growth effects of government spending: Cross-sectional and panel data evidence[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2011, 20(4): 574-590.
[[1]] 朱庆华,窦一杰.绿色供应链中政府与核心企业进化博弈模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,(12):85-89.
[[1]] 方荣贵,银路,王敏.新兴技术向战略性新兴产业演化中政府政策分项[J]. 技术经济, 2010,29(12):1-6.
[[1]] 张钦红,顾晓雯. 支持自主创新的两阶段政府采购政策[J]. 系统管理学报,2010,02:147-151.
[[1]] 苏竣,张汉威.从R&D到R&3D：基于全生命周期视角的新能源技术创新分析框架及政策启示[J]. 中国软科学, 2012(3): 93-99.
[[1]] 于斌斌.传统产业与战略性新兴产业的创新链接机理：基于产业链上下游企业进化博弈模型的分析[J].研究与发展管理,2012,24(3):100-109.
[[1]] Christian T, Adolfo P, Arnaud M. Cost and CO₂ aspects of future vehicle options in Europe under new energy policy scenarios[J]. Energy Policy, 2010(38):7142-7151.
[[1]] Alan J, Inês L A, Pedro F. The impact of federal incentives on the adoption of hybrid electric vehicles in the United States[J]. Energy Economics, 2013(40):936-942.
[[1]] Erin H G, Steven J S, James J. Winebrake. Increasing electric vehicle policy efficiency and effectiveness by reducing mainstream market bias[J]. Energy Policy, 2014(65):562-566.
[[1]] Geroski P A. What do we know about entry[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1995, 13(4):421-440.
[[1]] Audretsch D B, Santarelli E, Vivarelli M. Start up size and industrial dynamics: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1999, 17(7): 965-983.
[[1]] Dosi G. On some statistical regularities in the evolution of industries: Evidence, interpretation and open questions. In: Malerba F, Brusoni S. (Eds.), Perpectives on Innovation[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[[1]] Winter S G., Kaniovski Y M, Dosi G, Gordon J. Macdonald. Modeling industrial dynamics with innovative entrants[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2000,11(3):255-293.
[[1]] Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L. 'History-Friendly' models of industry evolution: The computer industry[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1999,8(1): 3-40.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	0

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	0

	来源

	次数
	比例

[1]	张凡, 罗义, 宋春晓, 潘杰义. 基于fsQCA方法的高新技术企业高质量发展路径——以陕西省为例 [J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(4): 796-811.
[2]	郁培丽, 石俊国, Bert Sadowshi, 向涛. 考虑技术体制和需求结构下破坏性创新与产业演化[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(3): 485-493.
[3]	田立法1, 2，张光磊3. 创新战略、高绩效工作系统与企业绩效关系机理[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015, 24(4): 552-562.