系统管理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 904-916.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-4558.2026.04.002

• • 上一篇    下一篇

重大工程永临结合的多主体决策行为分析

宋瑞震,高鑫,贾富源,南浩楠   

  1. 上海交通大学 安泰经济与管理学院,上海 200030
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-03 修回日期:2025-08-15 出版日期:2026-07-28 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71942006)

Multi-Stakeholder Decision-Making Behavior Analysis of Permanent-Temporary Integration in Megaprojects

Song Ruizhen,Gao Xin,Jia Fuyuan,Nan Haonan   

  1. Antai College of Economics and Management,Shanghai Jiao Tong University,Shanghai 200030,China
  • Received:2025-07-03 Revised:2025-08-15 Online:2026-07-28 Published:2026-08-03

摘要: 重大工程永临结合是将项目运营阶段的永久性工程与建设阶段的临时性工程相融合的设计理念,既能避免临建设施拆除造成的资源浪费,又有助于推进惠民利民的基础设施建设。然而,永临结合涉及的多主体利益协调难度较大,亟须建立推动多方合作的管理机制。本文基于演化博弈理论,构建涵盖地方政府、业主与承包商的多主体决策博弈模型,在不确定性环境下分析各利益主体参与永临结合的决策演化过程,并探究了关键影响因素。研究结果表明:地方政府、业主与承包商之间可形成稳定的合作关系,其中地方政府的策略选择是实现稳定状态的关键;民生型永临结合工程适宜采用“合作型”投资模式,而战略型永临结合工程则更适合“主导型”投资模式;出资比例分配不合理可能引发地方政府与业主在永临结合决策中的矛盾;对承包商的施工质量进行实时监督,是推动各方参与永临结合的重要手段。

关键词: 重大工程, 永临结合, 投资模式, 仿真分析

Abstract: Permanent-temporary integration (PTI) in megaprojects refers to the design concept of integrating permanent facilities for the operation phase with temporary facilities for the construction phase. This approach not only avoids resource waste caused by dismantling temporary facilities but also promotes infrastructure construction that benefits the public. However, coordinating the interests of participating stakeholders remains challenging, highlighting the need for management mechanisms that encourage multi-stakeholder collaboration. Drawing on evolutionary game theory, this paper develops a multi-stakeholder decision-making game model involving local governments, project owners, and contractors. The model analyzes the evolutionary process of stakeholders’ decision-making behaviors regarding permanent-temporary integration, along with key influencing factors. The results indicate that stable cooperation can form among local governments, owners, and contractors, with local governments’ strategic choices being critical to achieving equilibrium. Livelihood-oriented PTI projects are better suited to a “cooperative” investment model, while strategic projects are more appropriate for a “dominant” investment model. Furthermore, unreasonable allocation of investment proportions may lead to conflicts between local governments and project owners, while real-time supervision of contractors’ construction quality proves to be an effective measure for promoting stakeholder participation.

Key words: megaprojects, permanent-temporary integration (PTI), investment models, simulation analysis

中图分类号: