| [1] Dillman D A. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method[M]. New York, NY: John Wiley, 2007.[2] Vannieuwenhuyze J, Loosveldt G, Molenberghs G. A method for evaluating mode effects in mixed-mode surveys[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2010, 74(5): 1027-1045.[3] Vannieuwenhuyze J, Loosveldt G, Molenberghs G. A method to evaluate mode effects on the mean and variance of a continuous variable in mixed-mode surveys[J]. International Statistical Review, 2012, 80(2): 306-322.[4] Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality[J]. Journal of Public Health, 2005, 27(3): 281-291.[5] Heerwegh D. Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: an experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects[J]. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2009, 21(1): 111-121.[6] De Leeuw E D. To mix or not to mix data collection modes in surveys[J]. Journal of Official Statistics, 2005, 21(2): 233-255.[7] Dillman D A, Phelps G, Tortora R, et al. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response and the Internet[J]. Social Science Research, 2009, 38(1): 1-18.[8] Kreuter F, Presser S, Tourangeau R. Social desirability bias in CATI, IVR, and web surveys[J]. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2008, 72(5): 847-865.[9] Heerwegh D, Loosveldt G. Assessing mode effects in a National Crime Victimization Survey using structural equation models: Social desirability bias and acquiescence[J]. Journal of Official Statistics, 2011, 27(1): 49-63.[10] 樊茗玥. 网络调查数据质量控制研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2011.[11] 于洪彦, 黄晓治. 书面调查和网络调查的区别——两种数据收集方法的比较[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2011, 26(10): 97-103.[12] Robinson J P, Shaver P R, Wrightsman L S. Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes[M]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1991.[13] Tourangeau R, Yan T. Sensitive questions in surveys[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, 133(5): 859-883.[14] Krosnick J A. Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys[J]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1991, 5(3): 213-236.[15] 新浪公司, 北京大学, 第一象限公司. 2012年新浪微博用户发展调查报告[R]. 北京: 新浪公司, 2012.[16] Bentler P M, Mooijaart A. Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rational based on precision[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 106(2): 315-317.[17] Welkenhuysen-Gybels J, Billiet J, Cambré B. Adjustment for acquiescence in the assessment of the construct equivalence of Likert-Type Score Items[J]. Journal of Cross-Culture Psychology, 2003, 34(1): 702-722.[18] Billiet J B, McClendon M J. Modeling acquiescence in measurement models for two balanced sets of items[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2000, 7(4): 608-628.[19] Marsh H W. Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors?[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 70(4): 810-819.[20] Watson D. Correcting for acquiescent response bias in the absence of a balanced scale: An application to class consciousness[J]. Sociological Methods and Research, 1992, 21(1): 52-88.[21] Byrne B M, Shavelson R J, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1989, 105(3): 456-466.[22] Vandenberg R J, Lance C E. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2000, 3(1): 4-70.[23] Jöreskog K G. Structural equation modeling with ordinal variables using LISREL[DB/OL]. http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf, 2005.[24] Cheung G W, Rensvold R B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance[J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 2002, 9(2): 233-255.[25] Paulhus D L. Two-component models of socially desirable responding[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1984, 46(3): 598-609.[26] Newman J C, Des Jarlais D C, Paone D, et al. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 2002, 92(2): 294-297. |
