异质消费者行为模式下的双渠道供应链系统协调与优化

doi:F 253

系统管理学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 762-768.DOI: F 253

异质消费者行为模式下的双渠道供应链系统协调与优化

李锋，魏莹

华南理工大学工商管理学院，广州 510640

收稿日期:2013-04-14 修回日期:2013-09-02
作者简介:李锋（1975-），男，博士，副教授。研究方向为复杂系统建模与仿真、供应链管理。 E-mail: fenglee@scut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71171085，71101063）

Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination and Optimization with Heterogeneous Consumer Behavior

LI Feng1，WEI Ying2

1.School of Business Administration，South China University of Technology，Guangzhou 510640，China；2. Department of Business Administration，Jinan University，Guangzhou 510632，China

Received:2013-04-14 Revised:2013-09-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以1个制造商和1个零售商组成的二级、双渠道供应链系统为研究对象，研究当目标市场中潜在顾客的购买决策存在包括“有限理性”、渠道忠诚在内的多种行为模式时，供应链系统的最优定价策略。为了研究复杂的消费者行为，采取了基于多智能体建模与仿真的方法，通过计算机仿真来实现系统分析和优化。仿真结果表明，无视市场上个性化的消费者行为，必然导致决策者的利润流失。进一步分析指出收益共享机制能够实现协调供应链渠道之间冲突，并实现双赢。研究结论还包括分散决策情景下，制造商占据博弈主导地位对双方而言都是有利的；博弈主导方可以通过信息不对称而获利等。

关键词: 消费者行为, 供应链协调, 双渠道供应链, 多智能体建模

Abstract: This paper studies a two-echelon dual-channel supply chain system in which a manufacturer sells a single product to customers through its owned online channel and an independent retailer. In the market, potential customers make their own purchasing decision according to product price on each channel, their preference for each channel—loyalty, and degree of rationality in decision-making process, etc. The main purpose is to analyze how these individuals influence the pricing strategies of supply chain members. Due to complexity of the problem, we use an agent-based modeling approach. The simulation results show that profits of both sides may decrease once the consumer behavior is neglected. The profit sharing mechanism is valid for the coordination of channel conflict. Moreover, the results imply that the manufacturer acting as the leader in Stackelberg game is a better option for the retailer, and the dominant player in the game benefits from information asymmetry.

Key words: consumer behavior, supply chain coordination, dual-channel supply chain, multi-agent modeling

李锋，魏莹. 异质消费者行为模式下的双渠道供应链系统协调与优化[J]. 系统管理学报, 2015, 24(5): 762-768.

参考文献

[1]Ibragimov R, Walden J. Optimal bundling strategies under heavy-tailed valuations[J]. Management Science. 2010, 56(11):1963-1976.
[2]Banerjee A V. A simple model of herd behavior[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1992, 107(3): 797-817.
[3]Zhang T, Zhang D. Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2007, 60(8): 912-922.
[4]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[5] Basov S. Bounded rationality: Static versus dynamic approaches[J]. Economic Theory, 2005, 25(4): 871-885.
[6]Li F, Du T C. Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion-leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51: 190-197.
[7]Wang C X, Webster S. The loss-averse newsvendor problem[J]. OMEGA, 2009, 37(1): 93-105.
[8]Li F. Impact of reference point on loss-averse newsvendor problem [C]. In Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Operations and Supply Chain Management. 2010, 574-578.
[9]Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4): 566-589.
[10]Mersereau A J, Zhang D. Markdown pricing with unknown fraction of strategic customers[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(3): 355-370.
[11]Su X. Optimal pricing with speculators and strategic consumers[J]. Management Science, 2010, 56(1): 25-40.
[12]Chiang W K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply chain design[J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(1): 1-20.
[13] Li F. A Framework for Multi-Agent Based Supply Network Simulation[C]//In Proceedings of 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science, 2010：1-4.

[1]	李健, 李梦春, 董雪璠. 基于双向期权契约的应急物资采购储备模型 [J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(3): 463-475.
[2]	李锋, 魏莹. 平台电商的用户细分策略及行为定价[J]. 系统管理学报, 2023, 32(2): 260-275.
[3]	常珊, 胡斌, 汪婷婷. 考虑促销努力的供应链产能策略及其协调[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(4): 619-633.
[4]	王威昊, 胡劲松. 品牌危机预期下的双渠道供应链动态质量与营销决策[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(3): 413-427.
[5]	朱宝琳, 薛林, 戢守峰, 邱若臻. 零售商风险规避下基于联合契约的双渠道供应链库存决策模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2022, 31(2): 217-229.
[6]	郭金森, 周永务, 任鸣鸣, 杨玉珍. 双边资金约束下基于公平偏好制造商的双渠道供应链融资策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2021, 30(5): 892-904.
[7]	喻鸣谦, 蔡敏, 杨钦杰. 顾客退货双渠道供应链中资金约束零售商融资策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2021, 30(4): 676-684.
[8]	王义宝, 高丹, 原白云. 考虑公平关切的双渠道供应链垂直合作广告模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(6): 1205-1214.
[9]	余大勇, 钱佳, 陈雪柔, 徐最. 需求推断差异下供应链成员的运营决策机制[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(5): 987-993.
[10]	吴开兰, 刘名武, 许茂增. 不同主导力量下供应商减排投资的谎报与协调策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(4): 782-793.
[11]	李锋, 魏莹. 病毒式营销策略下的损失规避报童问题[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(4): 816-823.
[12]	杨家权, 张旭梅. 考虑零售商策略性库存的双渠道供应链定价及协调[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(1): 174-182.
[13]	李锋, 林宁, 魏莹. “病毒”营销策略下报童问题研究[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(6): 1188-194.
[14]	陈建新, 周永务, 钟远光. 基于CVaR准则的资金约束供应链回购契约协调策略[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(3): 552-559.
[15]	徐广业, 蔺全录, 孙金岭. 基于消费者渠道迁徙行为的双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(2): 386-391.