Journal of Systems & Management ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 45-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-4558.2026.01.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Timing Decisions in Green Research and Development in a Duopoly with Spillover Effects

LI Jinxi1, YI Yuyin2   

  1. 1.School of Digital Economy and Management, Suzhou City University, Suzhou 215104, Jiangsu, China; 2. School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Received:2023-11-20 Revised:2024-08-15 Online:2026-01-28 Published:2026-02-12

考虑溢出效应的双寡头绿色研发时机选择

李金溪1,易余胤2   

  1. 1. 苏州城市学院 数字经济与管理学院,江苏 苏州 215104;2. 暨南大学 管理学院,广州 510632
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省高校哲学社会科学一般项目(2024SJYB1079);广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2021A1515012002);贵州省哲学社会科学
    规划课题(25GZYB121)

Abstract: As consumers increasingly prefer green energy-efficient products, enterprises engage in green research and development (R&D) to improve the environmental performance of their products and strengthen  market competitiveness. However, because green R&D exhibits spillover effects, competitors can easily learn from or imitate these efforts, reducing their won R&D costs. Some competitors may even “leapfrog” and achieve an advantage in product greenness. This creates a dilemma for firms: should they engage in green R&D early to gain a first-mover advantage, or should they wait and benefit from competitors’ spillovers? To address problem, this paper develops a two-period duopoly game model. The results show that the there are two pure-strategy Nash equilibria in the timing of green R&D. When the spillover rate is low, the duopolies choose to conduct green R&D in the first period. However, the equilibrium profit in this scenario is lower than if they conduct R&D in the second period, creating a classic prisoner’s dilemma. When the spillover rate is high, the duopolies choose to conduct green R&D at different periods. In this case, the firm that invests first achieves higher profits and exerts greater R&D effort than the later firm. As the spillover rate increases, the first-mover’s profit and R&D effort gradually decline, while the second-mover’s profit and effort increase. Furthermore, in the scenario where the two firms conduct R&D in different periods, a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium also exists. In this case, the probability that each firm conducts green R&D in the second period increases with the spillover rate.

Key words: spillover effects, duopoly competition, green research and development (R&D)

摘要: 在消费者日益偏好绿色节能产品的背景下,为提升市场竞争力,企业倾向于开展绿色研发以提升产品绿色水平。然而,由于绿色研发具有外溢性,其成果易被竞争对手学习和模仿,这将使得竞争对手的研发成本降低,甚至可能使竞争对手因此“后来居上”,在绿色产品水平上取得领先。因此,企业面临着两难选择:是率先进行绿色研发以抢占市场,还是等待竞争对手研发、坐享溢出。为研究这一问题,本文构建了一个两时期双寡头竞争博弈模型。研究结果表明,双寡头在绿色研发时机的选择上存在两种纯策略纳什均衡:① 当溢出率较低时,双寡头均选择在第1时期进行绿色研发,但此时的均衡利润低于两企业均在第2时期研发的情形,双寡头因此陷入“囚徒困境”;② 当溢出率较高时,双寡头会选择在不同时期进行绿色研发。此时,先研发企业的利润与绿色研发努力程度均高于后研发企业,且随着溢出率的提高,先研发企业的利润与绿色研发努力程度逐渐降低,而后研发企业的利润与绿色研发努力程度逐步增加。此外,在双寡头先后进行绿色研发的情形下,还存在一个混合策略纳什均衡,在此均衡中,双寡头在第2时期进行研发的概率随着溢出率的上升而增加。

关键词: 溢出效应, 双寡头竞争, 绿色研发

CLC Number: