系统管理学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 984-997.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-4558.2026.04.009

• 决策科学与运营管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑库存损耗的供应链投资RFID技术决策与协调机制设计

杨惠霄1,姜晨琪1,弋泽龙2   

  1. 1.浙江工业大学 管理学院,杭州 310023;2. 深圳大学 经济学院,广东 深圳 518060
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-01 修回日期:2024-08-10 出版日期:2026-07-28 发布日期:2026-08-03
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金优青项目(72222019);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72274175,72171154);教育部人文社会科学规划基金资助项目(22YJA630102);浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(24ZJQN057Y);浙江省属高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(GB202103003);浙江工业大学社科预研基金资助项目(SKY-ZX-20220214)

Supply Chain Investment in RFID Technology and Coordination Mechanism Design Considering Inventory Shrinkage

Yang Huixiao1,Jiang Chenqi1,Yi Zelong2   

  1. 1. School of Management,Zhejiang University of Technology,Hangzhou 310023,China;2. College of Economics,Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060,Guangdong,China
  • Received:2024-05-01 Revised:2024-08-10 Online:2026-07-28 Published:2026-08-03

摘要: 本文研究由单个制造商与单个零售商组成的供应链。投资 RFID 技术前,零售商会面临库存损耗问题,双方通过批发价契约交易;投资后,零售商将部分销售收入分享给制造商。研究发现,单独引入收入共享机制虽能提升制造商利润,但会降低零售商利润。为此,本文进一步考察了3种协调机制:收入共享加批发价谈判、收入共享加批发价与订货量谈判,以及批发价与收入共享比例谈判,旨在明确收入共享机制下双方利润同时改善的条件,比较供应链成员及整体对各类协调机制的偏好,进而界定在投资RFID技术后双方均能获得更高利润的条件,以及收入共享机制增强成员投资RFID技术动机的条件。最后,比较不同协调机制下两家企业投资RFID技术的动机。研究得出若干新结论,既为供应链成员在投资单品级RFID技术时的动机协调提供启示,也为丰富供应链协调理论作出贡献。

关键词: 供应链协调, 博弈分析, 射频识别技术, 库存损耗, 机制设计

Abstract: This paper considers a supply chain composed of a single manufacturer and a single retailer. Before investing in radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, the retailer faces inventory shrinkage issues, and the two parties transact under a wholesale price contract. After investing in RFID technology, the retailer shares part of the sales revenue with the manufacturer. It is found that introducing only a revenue-sharing mechanism increases the manufacturer’s profit but reduces the retailer’s profit. Therefore, three coordination mechanisms are further explored: revenue sharing with negotiated wholesale prices, revenue sharing with negotiated wholesale prices and order quantities, and negotiated wholesale prices with revenue-sharing ratios. The objective is to identify conditions under which revenue-sharing mechanisms can simultaneously improve profits for both parties, analyze preferences for different coordination mechanisms, and determine when both parties benefit from RFID investment. This paper also compares investment incentives under different mechanisms. It obtains several new conclusions, offering insights into motivating supply chain members to adopt item-level RFID technology and enriching supply chain coordination theory.

Key words: supply chain coordination, game theory, radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, inventory shrinkage, mechanism design

中图分类号: